• 手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    by Adam Thierer on July 31, 2024 · 在国内怎么翻国外app

    Cover of the Pathways DocumentOn July 23rd, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DoT) released Pathways to the Future of Transportation, which was billed as “a policy document that is intended to serve as a roadmap for innovators of new cross modal technologies to engage with the Department.” This guidance document was created by a new body called the Non-Traditional and Emerging Transportation Technology (NETT) Council, which was formed by U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine L. Chao last year. The NETT Council is described as “an internal deliberative body to identify and resolve jurisdictional and regulatory gaps that may impede the deployment of new technologies.”

    The creation of NETT Council and the issuance of its first major report highlight the continued growth of “soft law” as a major governance trend for emerging technology in the US. Soft law refers to informal, collaborative, and constantly evolving governance mechanisms that differ from hard law in that they lack the same degree of enforceability. A partial inventory of soft law methods includes: multistakeholder processes, industry best practices or codes of conduct, technical standards, private certifications, agency workshops and guidance documents, informal negotiations, and education and awareness efforts. But this list of soft law mechanisms is amorphous and ever-changing.

    Soft law systems and processes are multiplying at every level of government today: federal, state, local, and even globally. Such mechanisms are being tapped by government bodies today to deal with fast-moving technologies that are evolving faster than the law’s ability to keep up.

    The US Department of Transportation has become a leading candidate for Soft Law Central at the federal level. The agency has been tapping a variety of soft law mechanisms and approaches to deal with driverless cars and drone policy issues in particular. (See the essays listed down below for more details).

    The NETT Council represents the next wave of this governance trend. We might consider it an effort to bring a greater degree of formality and coordination to the agency’s soft law efforts. 免费翻国外墙的app

    SHARE: 在国内怎么翻国外app 0 comments

    手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    by Adam Thierer on July 29, 2024 · 0 comments

    In an amazing new MIT Technology Review piece, Antonio Regalado discusses how, “Some scientists are taking a DIY coronavirus vaccine, and nobody knows if it’s legal or if it works.” It is another powerful example of how “citizen-science” and medical self-experimentation (or “biohacking”) is increasingly being used to improve health outcomes, enhance human capabilities, or fight against deadly diseases like COVID. Regalado reports that:

    Nearly 200 covid-19 vaccines are in development and some three dozen are at various stages of human testing. But in what appears to be the first “citizen science” vaccine initiative, Estep and at least 20 other researchers, technologists, or science enthusiasts, many connected to Harvard University and MIT, have volunteered as lab rats for a do-it-yourself inoculation against the coronavirus. They say it’s their only chance to become immune without waiting a year or more for a vaccine to be formally approved.

    Among those who’ve taken the DIY vaccine is George Church, the celebrity geneticist at Harvard University, who took two doses a week apart earlier this month. The doses were dropped in his mailbox and he mixed the ingredients himself.

    Regalado notes that this is all happening despite legal and ethical questions:

    快帆 – 从海外翻墙回国 – 下载快帆指南:通过“快帆”扬帆回中国，快人一步，大概1100万海外华人都在用的音乐视频加速器。出国后，我发现“墙”挡住了回程。海外戏剧的纠缠。我相信许多海外旅行者都打开了熟悉的视频，但遭到“版权仅限于中国大陆”的 …

    Continue reading →

    SHARE: 0 comments

    手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    by 在国内怎么翻国外app on July 28, 2024 · 0 comments

    I was speaking at a virtual conference recently and was discussing my life’s work, which for 30 years has been focused on the importance of innovation and intellectual battles over what we mean progress. I whipped up a short list of some things I have written over just the past 5 years on this topic and thought I would just re-post them here:

    UNDERSTANDING THE CHALLENGE WE FACE:

    • The Radicalization of Modern Tech Criticism
    • Is It ‘Techno-Chauvinist’ & ‘Anti-Humanist’ to Believe in the Transformative Potential of Technology?

    快帆-海外华人听国内音乐看视频玩游戏的中国VPN工具 3.3 ...:2021-8-29 · 「快帆」是一款免费帮助海外华人用户翻墙回国内高速访问中国网络的VPN加速软件，可众让境外华人从国外直连到中国国内，无论在世界何处，都可众无任何限制的使用酷狗、网易云音乐、QQ音乐、优酷、爱奇艺、B站、微信等国内资源，即使身在海外也能与

    • How To Defend a Culture of Innovation During the Technopanic
    • How Technology Expands the Horizons of Our Humanity
    • Deep Technologies & Moonshots: Should We Dare to Dream? 
    • The Right to Pursue Happiness, Earn a Living, and Innovate
    • Permissionless Innovation: The Continuing Case for Comprehensive Technological Freedom 

    Continue reading →

    在国内怎么翻国外app 快帆翻国外加速软件 0 comments

    手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    by Adam Thierer on July 28, 2024 · 免费翻国外墙的app

    在国内怎么翻国外appFew things unify people in America more than beer and liquor regulations. On one side you have the forces of repression, who either favor strong liquor taxes and regulations on moralistic grounds, or because they favor curtailing competition and choice for a variety of reasons. On the other side you have those of us looking to end the insanity of quasi-Prohibitionary rules that do nothing to boost public health but do plenty to annoy the living hell out of us (and cost us plenty). And the really interesting thing is that these two groups contain plenty of people of radically different political persecutions. Liquor regulations are the greatest destroyer of political partisanship ever!

    For those of us who favor liberalization, as I write in my latest 免费翻国外墙的appcolumn:

    The good news is that evasive entrepreneurs and an increasingly technologically-empowered public will keep pushing back and hopefully whittle away at the continuing vestiges of Prohibition Era stupidity. Where there’s a will, there’s a way, and when people want a drink, crafty entrepreneurs will usually find a way to deliver.

    I talk a walk back through history and discuss how efforts to evade ridiculous liquor controls have been a longstanding feature of the American experience. People can be remarkably creative when seeking to circumvent silly rules–both before, during, and after Prohibition. Continue reading →

    SHARE: 免费翻国外墙的app 0 comments

    手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    by Adam Thierer on July 26, 2024 · 0 comments

    ImageI was very sad to learn that James Gattuso passed away this week. James was a friend and a wonderful mentor to me. I actually took his position at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s, which he had vacated a few years prior to go to work in the White House. But after I left Heritage in 2000, James returned shortly thereafter to take back essentially the same position. We often joked that Heritage should just name the position after us and let us play musical chairs there forevermore! 

    I learned so much from James through the years and regularly sought his advice on matters. In fact, when I first started this blog in 2004, James was one of the first three people I reached out to and asked to join. He contributed dozens of essays here. His entries read like newspaper dispatches from the frontlines of a battle. I always thought James would have made a terrific reporter, but his love of liberty made him want to fight for a cause. Hence, his life-long devotion to policy advocacy and the freedom to innovate in particular. 

    But the most important thing I learned from working with James was how to properly conduct myself as an analyst and a human being. James was such a kind soul, and he always had time for everyone. Most importantly, he treated them with enormous respect, even when he violently disagreed with them. He listened carefully, digested arguments, and addressed them with a cool tenor, but also a powerful wit.

    James famously developed a set of “10 Rules for Policy Analysts” that reflected much of that wisdom. His first rule: If the answer looks easy, you’ve missed something. There’s probably a reason no one has thought of it before.” His third: “Don’t assume everyone has read your paper, even if it is really, really good. Most people didn’t get past the first paragraph. Most of those only read the title.” There are many other gems like that in his Top 10 list. 

    工信部回应VPN指导意见:不会影响国内外用户正常使用 ...:2021-1-30 · 中国网1月30日讯国务院新闻办1月30日举行新闻发布会,华尔街日报记者就VPN相关情况在会上进行提问,"请您介绍一下于1月27日发布的关于VPN的指导意见 ...

    As you age, you realize that’s nonsense, of course. But James taught me early on to avoid falling into this trap. I used to be pretty hot-headed in my early years as an analyst, but James would gently caution me about why I might be better off considering my intellectual opponents in a different light and granting them the same measure of respect that I hoped to garner from them myself. It’s a simple but powerful notion that is too often ignored–in all aspects of life. But James lived by that rule and everyone I know respected him enormously as a result. His advice and his example provide us with a model to live by.     

    Thank you for everything you taught me, James. You will be missed, but never forgotten. 

    Image may contain: text that says '10 Rules for Policy Analysts James Gattuso easy, the before. assume guy 3. Don't assume read the first paragraph There' one evil. He but will probably paper, even really, really thought ofit plagiarize yourself, everyone Most people didn' get that freely. CORROLARY: Others will plagiarize something sources. with yourself. You make the certainly percent for Deal with others. until you can make CORROLARY: the subject The newspaper CORROLARY: be quoted by reporter tell virtually certain quoted by reporter argument nothing actually reporter for picture, you know subject. nothing about considered, quotable. thing. probably not good thing.'

    快帆翻国外加速软件

    SHARE: 0 comments

    手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    by Brent Skorup on July 22, 2024 · 在国内怎么翻国外app

    快喵VPN(免费版)-VPN翻墙神器，网络直通车的vpn大师 ...:2021-4-29 · App ：快喵VPN(免费版)-VPN翻墙神器，网络直通车的vpn大师，openVPN中的superVPN 版本 ：3.2.2 系统 ：4.0.3 及更高版本 提供者 ：VPN 翻墙 开发者 ：kuaimiaoVPN_X@gmail.com Google Play 下载 快喵VPN(免费版)

    Last month, the FAA came out in favor of “urban air mobility corridors”–point-to-point aerial highways that new eVTOL, helicopter, and passenger drones will use. It’s a great proposal, but the FAA’s plan for allocating and sharing those corridors is largely to let the industry negotiate it among themselves (the “Community Business Rules”):

    Operations within UAM Corridors will also be supported by CBRs collaboratively developed by the stakeholder community based on industry standards or FAA guidelines and approved by the FAA.

    This won’t end well, much like Congress and the Postmaster General letting the nascent airlines in the 1930s divvy up air routes didn’t end well–we’re still living with the effects of those anticompetitive decisions. Decades later the FAA is still refereeing industry fights over routes and airport access.

    Rather, regulators should create airspace markets because otherwise, as McKinsey analysts noted last year about urban air mobility:

    快帆加速器——华人专用听国内音乐看视频玩游戏的VPN工具 ...:快帆加速器——华人专用听国内音乐看视频玩游戏的VPN工具: Free Android app (5.0 ★, 50,000+ downloads) → Fast sail - overseas Chinese listen to domestic music …

    Airspace today is a common-pool resource rationed via regulation and custom. But with drones, eVTOL, and urban air mobility, congestion will increase and centralized air traffic control will need to give way to a more federated and privately-managed airspace system. As happened with spectrum: a demand shock to an Ostrom-ian common pool resource should lead to enclosure and “propertization.”

    Markets in airspace probably should have been created decades ago once airline routes became fixed and airports became congested. Instead, the centralized, regulatory rationing led to large economic distortions:

    For example, in 1968, nearly one-third of peak-time New York City air traffic–the busiest region in the US–was general aviation (that is, small, personal) aircraft. To combat severe congestion, local authorities raised minimum landing fees by a mere $20 (1968 dollars) on sub 25-seat aircraft. General aviation traffic at peak times immediately fell over 30%—suggesting that a massive amount of pre-July 1968 air traffic in the region was low-value. The share of aircraft delayed by 30 or more minutes fell from 17% to about 8%.

    This pricing of airspace and airport access was half-hearted and resisted by incumbents. Regulators fell back on rationing via the creation of “slots” at busy airports, which were given mostly to dominant airlines. Slots have the attributes of property–they can be defined, valued, sold, transferred, borrowed against. But the federal government refuses to call it property, partly because of the embarrassing implications. The GAO said in 2008:

    快帆 - 快帆Windows、Mac实现全局翻墙方法教程... | Facebook:快帆Windows、Mac实现全局翻墙方法教程 亲爱的饭团伔，由于经常收到你伔的反馈，快帆电脑版无法实现全局模式，导致无法使用酷狗、爱奇艺、优酷等客户端，为了饭团伔更好的体验，我伔整理热心饭团【Mc 再续辉煌丶】分享的方法供大家使用~ 使用方法： 1、在电脑上使用浏览器打开快帆官网...

    It may be too late to have airspace and route markets for traditional airlines–but it’s not too late for drones and urban air mobility. Demarcating aerial corridors should proceed quickly to bring the drone industry and services to the US. As Adam has pointed out, this is a global race of “innovation arbitrage”–drone firms will go where regulators are responsive and flexible. Federal and state aviation officials should not give away valuable drone routes, which will end up going to first-movers and the politically powerful. Airspace markets, in contrast, avoid anticompetitive lock-in effects and give drone innovators a chance to gain access to valuable routes in the future.

    手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    Law journal article. The North Carolina JOLT published my article, “Auctioning Airspace,” in October 2024. I argued for the FAA to demarcate and auction urban air mobility corridors (SSRN).

    Mercatus white paper. In March 2024 Connor Haaland and I explained that federal and state transportation officials 快帆Speedin apk file | ApkFiles.com:Download free apk file 『全新上线，免费使用』 「快帆」是一款免费帮助海外华人用户翻墙回国内高速访问中国网络的VPN加速软件，可众让境外华人从国外直连到中国国内，无论在世界何处，都可众无任何限制的使用酷狗、网易云音乐、QQ音乐、优 because many state laws allow local and state authorities to lease such airspace.

    Law journal article. A student note in a 2024 免费翻国外墙的app issue discusses airspace leasing for drone operations (pdf).

    FAA report. The FAA’s Drone Advisory Committee in March 2018 took up the idea of auctioning or leasing airspace to drone operators as a way to finance the increased costs of drone regulations (pdf).

    免费翻国外墙的app The GAO reviewed the idea of auctioning or leasing airspace to drone operators in a December 2024 report (pdf).

    Airbus UTM white paper. The Airbus UTM team reviewed the idea of auctioning or leasing airspace to UAM operators in a March 2024 report, “Fairness in Decentralized Strategic Deconfliction in UTM” (pdf).

    Federalist Society video. I narrated a video for the Federalist Society in July 2024 about airspace design and drone federalism (YouTube).

    Mercatus Center essay. Adam Thierer, Michael Koutrous, and Connor Haaland 快帆翻国外加速软件 drone industry red tape how the US can’t have “innovation by regulatory waiver,” and how to accelerate widespread drone services.

    I’ve discussed the idea in several outlets and events, including:

    • Wall Street Journal op-ed
    • 2024 Global Air Traffic Management Conference panel
    • A Harvard Law School drone policy event
    • 在国内怎么翻国外app magazine essay

    手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    • In a Federalist Society podcast episode, Adam Thierer and I discussed airspace markets and drone regulation with US Sen. Mike Lee. (Sen. Lee has introduced a bill to draw a line in the sky at 200 feet in order to clarify and formalize federal, state, and local powers over low-altitude airspace.)
    • Tech Policy Institute podcast episode with Sarah Oh, Eli Dourado, and Tom Lenard.
    • Macro Musings 在国内怎么翻国外app episode with David Beckworth.
    • Drone Radio Show podcast episode with Randy Goers.
    • Drones in America 在国内怎么翻国外app episode with Grant Guillot.
    • Uncommon Knowledge podcast episode with Juliette Sellgren.
    • Building Tomorrow podcast episode with Paul Matzko and Matthew Feeney.
    • sUAS News podcast episode and interview.

    SHARE: 免费翻国外墙的app 0 comments

    手机加速器免费版全部加- 烧饼哥加速器

    by Adam Thierer on July 21, 2024 · 0 comments

    Does anyone remember Blockbuster and Hollywood Video? I assume most of you do, but wow, doesn’t it seem like forever ago when we actually had to drive to stores to get movies to watch at home? What a drag that was!

    Yet, just 15 years ago, that was the norm and those two firms were the titans of video distribution, so much so that federal regulators at the Federal Trade Commission looked to stop their hegemony through antitrust intervention. But then those firms and whatever “market power” they possessed quickly evaporated as a wave of Schumpeterian creative destruction swept through video distribution markets. Both those firms and antitrust regulators had completely failed to anticipate the tsunami of technological and marketplace changes about to hit in the form of alternative online video distribution platforms as well as the rise of smartphones and robust nationwide mobile networks.

    Today, this serves as a cautionary tale of what happens when regulatory hubris triumphs over policy humility, as Trace Mitchell and I explain in this new essay for National Review Online entitled, “The Crystal Ball of Antitrust Regulators Is Cracked.” As we note:

    There is no discernable end point to the process of entrepreneurial-driven change. In fact, it seems to be proliferating rapidly. To survive, even the most successful companies must be willing to quickly dispense with yesterday’s successful business plans, lest they be steamrolled by the relentless pace of technological change and ever-shifting consumer demands. It is easy to understand why some people find it hard to imagine a time when Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google won’t be quite as dominant as they are today. But it was equally challenging 20 years ago to imagine that those same companies could disrupt the giants of that era.

    Hopefully today’s policymakers will have a little more patience and trust competition and continued technological innovation to bring us still more wonderful video choices.

    [OC] Blockbuster Video US store locations between 1986 and 2024 from 免费翻国外墙的app

    SHARE: 免费翻国外墙的app 0 comments

    Repeal the EligibleTelecommunications Carrier Designation

    by Hance Haney on July 19, 2024 · 0 comments

    America’s small towns are underpopulated, while big cities of plague, protests, and panic are overpopulated, overpriced, and overpopularized. We could start by ensuring rural spaces high-speed internet (still unavailable as I can attest in the rural center of supposedly high-tech California)…. Victor Davis Hanson

    A proposal by Congressman G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina could be a big step in the right direction of opening up rural spaces to full participation in the modern economy.  

    His proposal would expand the eligibility of who can receive Federal support for building infrastructure in unserved areas, making it easier for cable operators, satellite providers and others to complete with traditional telecommunications carriers. 

    The Butterfield vision is gaining bipartisan support and may possibly be included in a stimulus package.  It certainly should be.  

    The proposal would simply eliminate the requirement that a competitor must receive designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) from a state public utility/service commission as a prerequisite for receiving Federal support.

    This requirement harkens back to a bygone era when cable, wireless and satellite services were not substitutes for landline telephone service.  At that time, small rural telephone providers worried that a competitor would “cherry pick” or “cream skim” their most lucrative (enterprise) customers—such as the local hospital—and strand the small rural telco in a potential death spiral serving only the barely profitable (or even unprofitable) consumer segment.

    Now that cable, satellite and wireless services are a substitute for many consumers, the requirement for ETC designation does nothing to protect small rural telcos from competition.  It is an anachronism.  However, it does create an unnecessary hurdle for cable, wireless and satellite providers to qualify for Federal support to help close the digital divide—which is an urgent priority.

    Originally intended to prevent the loss of telecommunications services in rural areas, the requirement now serves to prevent the necessary expansion of those services to keep up with the modern world economy.  

    As awful as this horrible pandemic is, at least we are driving less and spending more time with our families.  Many have learned that a daily commute may not be necessary.  Broadband seems to be boosting productivity and reducing air pollution at the same time.  Hopefully broadband can also help facilitate a revival of rural America.  

    SHARE: 快帆翻国外加速软件 0 comments

    “Policy Gone Viral” Podcast on Evasive Entrepreneurialism

    by Adam Thierer on July 16, 2024 · 免费翻国外墙的app

    Here’s a new episode of the James Madison Institute “Policy Gone Viral” podcast in which my former Mercatus Center colleague Andrea O’Sullivan and I discuss the future of technological innovation and the public policies governing it. The video is embedded below or you can listen to just the audio here.

    SHARE: 0 comments

    PeliCast Event on Evasive Entrepreneurialism & Permissionless Innovation

    by Adam Thierer on July 2, 2024 · 0 comments

    This week, it was my pleasure to be interviewed by Eric Peterson of the Pelican Institute on their “PeliCast” live video podcast. We discussed potential futures for permissionless innovation and, more importantly, what my favorite beer in Louisiana is. Tune in to find the answer!

     

    SHARE: 0 comments

    ← Previous Entries